![capture one style vs preset capture one style vs preset](https://cdn.filtergrade.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/02225528/Screen-Shot-2017-05-18-at-11.36.57-AM.png)
![capture one style vs preset capture one style vs preset](https://i.etsystatic.com/30292714/r/il/596fe3/3776802582/il_300x300.3776802582_9op3.jpg)
There are a couple of exceptions – it doesn’t open Hasselblad RAW files and a RAW files from a handful of older/cheaper camera brands, but generally its RAW support is very wide. This is the flagship edition and includes support for all camera brands. With the release of Capture One 22, this has changed, and these single-brand editions are no longer available.Ĭapture One has introduced a new service called Capture One Live, however, designed for professionals who need to collaborate remotely on live projects with clients and co-workers, via a regular web browser. Previously it had been sold as an all-cameras edition or as cheaper editions solely for Nikon, Sony or Fujifilm cameras. Its closest rival is Lightroom, but Capture One has a number of advantages for professional workflows (including tethered shooting), superior RAW processing and more sophisticated layer and mask based local adjustment tools. I think the main pitch was to persuade potential buyers that having a vast selection of styles available was a justification for purchasing the software even though they would be unlikely to use most of what was offered.Capture One editions, licenses and subscriptions explainedĬapture One is a professional image cataloguing, editing and processing tool. However, in all cases a lot of scrolling was evident (quantity of styles being important for sales?) even though the presenter, using his own images, almost always used exactly the same 2 or 3 styles for all of his images no matter what the content subject matter. The improved Gen.2 2024 classic neg film simulation in my free pack on the Filmist 3 film presets page. I recall, perhaps a decade or more past, watching some sales video guides for a different product that offered a huge number of styles. It seems to me that the Built-in and Paid-for packs would need to be offered just as they are and it should be left to the user to turn them into User Styles and Presets, sitting alongside their own Styles, in order to manage how they are grouped (and, as now, permit multiple copies of the same Style or Preset to make grouping in preferred "sets" simpler? Also to provide consistent use of the Keyboard Shortcut feature.) (I am not sure as I do not have any paid for Packs.) The same goes for Style Packs with the difference that, potentially, they would bot be automatically updates with each update or version upgrade. (There may be some issues about managing those styles and who has the rights to modify them if working in a Multi-User environment but that probably goes beyond the scope being discussed here.)įor Built in styles that are not copied to be User styles one can still modify the structure (i.e the Style Sets groups) used for delivery as part of the application installation BUT as the next new installation the styles and presets will be re-installed (potentially with some updates for functional compatibility reasons). However, as a thought challenge for how to work with a development design, there are certain considerations.įor User Styles (including copies of Built in styles and presets, as Okular has previously described) there is already the possibility to create and save a folder structure containing the required styles. Both programs are pretty quick to support new camera raw formats, but Capture One does not always have lens profiles for cheaper consumer lenses like the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 kit lens.
![capture one style vs preset capture one style vs preset](https://cdn.fstoppers.com/styles/full/s3/media/2016/10/24/color-matching-with-capture-one.png)
I'm not a great Styles user so this does not really concern me much.